Search for: "Davis v. 7 Eleven" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2016, 8:17 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 87607 (ND CA, July 6, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint that Muslim inmates are not allowed to pray in groups of more than four.In Davis v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Eleven years ago, the US Supreme Court upended its jurisprudence of the Confrontation Clause in Crawford v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:38 am by Richard Hunt
Davis next turned to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in  Doran v. 7Eleven, Inc., 524 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2008). [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The case of Lachaux v Independent Print, most important libel appeal of 2016 will be heard by the Court of Appeal (McFarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) on 29 and 30 November 2016. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:51 pm
The Council’s failure to deal with Mr Williams had been the subject of a previous Ombudsman’s report in 2007 (200501496/7/8), which had made extensive recommendations on Cardiff’s handling of ASB. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC, 2013 WL 5532767, at *7-8 (D. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
On 17 July 2014, Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the case of Building Register Ltd v Mark Weston ([2014] EWHC 2361 (QB)). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm by Melanie Fontes
” The Grouping Method The Grouping Method retains all the key elements of the current limited en banc procedure—eleven active judges on the panel, the chief judge guaranteed placement, and the other active judges having an equal chance to be selected—but slightly tweaks how the random draw occurs. [read post]